Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floyd “Timeless” Thomas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:31, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Floyd “Timeless” Thomas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable and no real assertion of any notability. Refs are self made videos , one dead-link and a promotional piece in a local paper (press release ?). Velella Velella Talk 21:31, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:13, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This local newspaper article is the only coverage I can find that could be suitable, but that't not sufficient to meet WP:BIO by itself. SmartSE (talk) 19:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Insufficient sources (present or easily findable) to meet WP:BIO. A vanity piece about a non-notable individual. Pol430 talk to me 21:00, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.