Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddy Shell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:36, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Eddy Shell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Eddy Shell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Shell's elected office fails WP:NPOL and the sources used in this article do not establish WP:GNG. GPL93 (talk) 17:33, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:11, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:12, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:12, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:13, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:13, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:14, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:15, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

• Delete another Billy Hathorn special. I didn't know it was possible for so many articles on marginal people to have been created by one editor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:06, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

@Johnpacklambert: Every time I think I've made a dent I've been proven wrong. The craziest part about it is there are even more articles that he created using socks. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:12, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. -- Hoary (talk) 23:51, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Another article from the Hathorn sock farm. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:25, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. Another Billy Hathorn classic, where the existence of an obituary in a local political figure's local media somehow constituted an automatic WP:GNG pass that exempted him from actually having to get the topic past WP:NPOL on significant and substantive and not just local press coverage. Not how it worked then, not how it works now. Bearcat (talk) 17:15, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
• Delete -- Merely a NN politician. The fact that his election involved under 2000 votes in his favour shows his position was that of a mere local politician. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:46, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.