Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zanaro's
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Zanaro's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not-notable. Fails WP:Corp Night of the Big Wind talk 02:12, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unable to find substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. Not notable. - SummerPhD (talk) 05:04, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – Try this search, which is more specific:
- Delete per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 06:40, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in reliable, independent third-party sources. Should such sources be integrated into the article, feel free to leave a note on my talk page and I'll take another look. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:41, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.